|
|
|
Doctor Konstantin Pavlovich
Buteyko and Buteyko Method
Konstantin Pavlovich Buteyko was born on the 27th January 1923, into the
small farming community of Ivanitsa (about 150km from Kiev). Inheriting
his fathers enthusiasm for machines, Konstantin was enrolled into the
Kiev Polytechnic Institute until his studies were interrupted by World
War II when Buteyko joined his country's armed forces. After his
experiences during the War, Buteyko felt compelled to study what he
called "the most complicated piece of machinery of all" - the human
organism.
In 1946,
he enrolled into the First Medical Institute in Moscow. During his third
year he started working in the clinical therapy group under the
departmental head, academician Evgeniy Mikhailovitch Tareiev.
During
this third year at the Institute, Buteyko was given a practical
assignment which involved monitoring diseased patients breathing. He
spent hundreds of hours sitting by patient's bedsides, recording their
breathing patterns prior to death. He noticed a considerable and
uniformed deepening in patients breathing with the approaching of death.
By recording these increases, Buteyko found that he was soon able to
form a prognoses on how many days or hours were left before the
patient's death occurred. This event determined the area of Buteyko's
future interest.
In 1952,
having graduated from the Institute with Honours, Buteyko continued his
experiments independently along similar lines. He asked healthy subjects
to breath deeply for a period of time, and found that they became dizzy
and nauseous, developed asphyxiating symptoms such as wheeziness and
coughing, and eventually fainted. This (he had been told) was due to
oxygen over-saturation of the brain.
During
the second month of this independent work it occurred to Buteyko that
certain diseases may develop as a result of deep breathing. He himself
had suffered form hypertension for some time, and had often pondered its
causes. By measuring his carbon dioxide levels, Buteyko discovered that
his body's carbon dioxide level was lower than recommended. It was known
that over breathing lowered carbon dioxide levels in the body. He
theorised that if his low levels were caused by over-breathing, then by
correcting his breathing he may be able to cure his disorder.
He
immediately began experimenting on himself. Soon he had trained himself
to breathe in a more shallow fashion. He found that by reducing his
breathing, some symptoms such as headache and rapid heart beat also
reduced. When he increased the depth of his breathing, the symptoms
returned. Buteyko concluded that he had discovered the reason for his
disease. He immediately set out to devise a program by which a patient's
breathing could be quickly and effectively measured and then, if need
be, reconditioned. He had shortly healed himself completely.
Buteyko
checked and rechecked his theory on patients. He measured the breathing
patterns of sufferers of asthma, angina and other diseases, discovering,
without surprise, that they too were hyperventilating. Once again by
correcting these patients' breathing to an acceptable level Buteyko was
able to normalise their carbon dioxide shortfall and their attacks
stopped immediately. When they were asked to return to their previous
breathing patterns, their attacks resumed. It was clear, that Buteyko
had stumbled across a very important discovery, a global discovery, and
that current medical thinking was upside down.
Through
further research, Buteyko was able to lay down the theoretical
foundation for this idea - hyperventilation causes a depletion of carbon
dioxide; low levels of carbon dioxide in the organism cause blood
vessels to spasm and also cause oxygen starvation of the tissues. This
results in a whole range of "defence mechanisms" that have been
previously misunderstood and labelled as diseases. It was not difficult
to surmise that vessel spasming occurring in hypertension could occur
also with other types of diseases, for example: stenocardia (angina
pectoris) with the resultant myocardial infarction (heart attack): end
arteritis (inflammation of the innermost coat of an artery, usually
occurring in legs) or ulcerative stomach disease. Scientific data
associated with the physiological role of carbon dioxide is discussed in
more detail in the "Buteyko Theoretical Manual".
Buteyko
worked very intensively at the Central and Lenin Medical Libraries
researching his theory. Was it really possible that for the entire
existence of the medical science such a simple thought had never
occurred to anyone else? He learnt very quickly that the answer to this
question was yes. For centuries, the majority of the human race had
taught their children to breath deeply, and no-one, even for a moment,
tried to reduce breathing. During his research, Buteyko was lucky to
learn of a few experiments supporting the viability of his thinking.
(See- Bohr, Holden, Priestly, Henderson, De Kosta). This then led to
Buteyko sharing his thoughts with his teachers, but he found no support
from any of them.
He knew
well, through his studies, that many medical discoveries had initially
been dismissed and suppressed officially only to become accepted
practice years later. He recalled the story of sepsis in 1846. A doctor
friend of Zemelweise had cut his finger while performing an autopsy on a
woman who had perished of sepsis (or "puerperal fever" as it was then
known). Three days later, the doctor also contracted the "puerperal
fever". Zemelweise concluded that "something" had been passed from the
corpse and into the doctors cut, via the blood. At the time microbes
were not yet known of, they were discovered by Pastor 20 years later.
With the
desire to confirm his supposition, Zemelweise began washing his hands
prior to operations, disinfecting them with a chloride of lime solution.
He suggested his assistants also follow this routine. In those times,
about one third of all new mothers and surgical patients died of sepsis.
A three month experiment confirmed Zemelweise's hypothesis, and he lost
no patients thereafter. He informed the society of surgeons and
suggested they follow his example. He was declared to be mentally
disturbed.
Similar
destiny befell Professor Lister, an Englishman, who ten years later also
called for disinfection of hands prior to operations. Only after this
discovery had reached the ears of the public, and hordes of patients'
relatives started to turn up at the operations demanding to know if the
surgeons had washed their hands before operating, did this procedure
become accepted by the surgeons. This happened half a century after the
initial discovery by Zemelweise.
Historical knowledge of this nature made it clear to Buteyko that
voicing his convictions was not likely to bring any positive results at
that stage. He knew he must organise an experimental laboratory . He had
to gather evidence, develop it, and only then, announce the fundamentals
of his ideas.
Later
that year Buteyko became a clinical therapy intern under Academic
Tareiev again. Here he was given his chance to establish a functional
diagnostics laboratory, This project failed due to lack of funds,
personnel and equipment. An attempt to establish the laboratory under
the auspices of the Ministry of Health in Moscow was also unsuccessful -
the necessary equipment was made available, but not the scientific
personnel. In 1958 Buteyko was invited by Professor Meshalkin to join
the Institute of Experimental Biology and Medicine at the Siberian
Branch of the USSR Academy of Science (where Meshalkin was the
director). Once again he set about the task of establishing a laboratory
of functional diagnostics. This project was completed in 1960.
In 1958 -
1959 Buteyko conducted clinical studies on nearly 200 people, both
healthy and sick. When the first data, various measurements,
associations, deductions, correlations, regulations, etc., were
obtained, all of these confirmed the correctness of Buteyko's discovery.
On 11th January 1960, he presented his work to the Scientific Forum at
the Institute and tried to explain the concepts of his thinking. He told
those present of the experiments, which showed the objective linear
relationship between the depth of breathing, the content of carbon
dioxide in the body and vessel spasm and degrees of illness.
Buteyko's
colleagues were stunned. Surgeons took the studies as some dirty trick,
because Buteyko offered to treat such diseases as asthma, hypertension,
angina, without a knife. Invasive surgery never cured these diseases
anyway, everybody knew that, and mortality was high. But the Buteyko
method gave a quick, almost 100% recovery. Quite naturally, Buteyko had
expected the surgeons to be delighted but unfortunately their reaction
was quite the opposite. Nevertheless, he did received temporary approval
from Professor Meshalkin who chaired the Forum. He said he understood
the perspective and wanted the research continued.
Over the
next ten years of the laboratory's existence, Buteyko and his team were
able to obtain extensive information on the basic functions of the human
organism - whether healthy or diseased. The laboratory was equipped at
the highest level. There was a compendium of over forty various
instruments capable of registering almost all basic functions of the
human organism, and producing approximately 100,000 pieces of data per
hour. Analysis of this information was done on computers, mathematically
deriving physiological measurements and the various conformities of the
body's processes.
Two
hundred medical specialists were trained in the laboratory, most of
whom, by the way, had suffered from one condition or another and
successfully treated themselves with the method. Soon they were all
treating other patients utilising Buteyko method. Official statistics
showed that as at 1 January 1967 more than 1000 patients suffering from
asthma, hypertension or angina had been successfully treated and had
totally recovered from their illnesses.
Despite
this, Meshalkin categorically refused Buteyko's request for a trial to
be conducted at the Institute's clinic. Shortly thereafter Meshalkin
mysteriously implemented brutal repression, up to the forcible
confiscation of the laboratory equipment. There were to be no
publications, and strong reprimands were made for any public appearances
or speeches on the subject. This attitude was exhibited not only by
Professor Meshalkin but by all of his student-surgeons. In 1963
Professor Meshalkin had also subjected a few new ideas which challenged
current opinions of surgery, to a similar treatment. As a result of
these unseemly management practices, the Institute was disbanded and
closed.
This
disbandment may have saved Buteyko's laboratory. He was able to keep one
third of all the instruments, personnel and the original laboratory
premises. From 1963 to 1968 the laboratory was attached to the Institute
of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of
Science. Professor Meshalkin's clinic was reassigned into the system of
the Russian Ministry of Health. Buteyko's repeated requests to accredit
his method had not met any support whatsoever.
Only in
January 1968, after representations made by the local and foreign press
in defence of his discoveries was the trial carried out in Leningrad, at
the Institute of Pulmonology under Academician Uglov. Shortly before
this, a visit was paid to Buteyko's clinic by the Minister of Health,
Academician Petrovsky. The Minister informed Buteyko that if he
successfully treated at least 80% of the patients given to him,
Petrovsky would make recommendations for an immediate entrenchment of
the method into standard medical practices. He promised also to make
available a 50 bed clinic for the continuation of Buteyko's clinical
work. The Minister had one condition - that the patients used in the
trial were the most serious and difficult cases, not otherwise treatable
by conventional methods of medicine.
Of the 46
patients who underwent Buteyko's treatment 44 (95%) were officially
recognised as cured. Only 2 from the 46 had a smaller positive effect.
Some of the patients had up to twenty different conditions each. One of
the female patients had been recommended to undergo a mastectomy, as she
was diagnosed to have a malignant tumour in the initial stages. She had
refused the operation. She was included on the list of patients because
of her asthma. She recovered not only from her asthma but from the rest
of her complaints, including the tumour.
It should
be added that the two patients not included in the success rate were
also relieved of their diseases after further treatment and had informed
the Minister responsible. Consequently, in effect, Buteyko could
describe the results of his method as having had a 100% success rate.
The
official conclusions of the trial, which was monitored by the health
ministry, were sent to the Health Minister, academician Petrovsky. These
conclusions were never seen by either Buteyko or the Siberian Branch of
the Academy of Science. The Minister later, in a phone call to the
chairman of the Siberian Branch, academician Lavrentiev, advised that
the trial had failed, with only two out of the 46 patients having been
cured. This unexplained falsification served as a foundation for closing
the Buteyko laboratory. On 14 August 1968, all of the scientists were
dismissed without any offers of alternative employment, and all of the
equipment was confiscated or pilfered.
However,
even against such great odds, the method survived. The originally
trained team of medical practitioners continued to treat patients.
Although not one official medical establishment in Moscow was using the
method, it was being used in Harkov, Chernigov, Kahovka, Leningrad,
Krasnoyarsk, Khabarovsk, Sverdlovsk, etc...
Success
after success forced the government to once again look into the method.
The second official trial was conducted at the First Moscow Institute of
Paediatric Diseases in April 1980 at the direction of the Government
Committee for Science and Technology of the Soviet Ministry of USSR. The
study confirmed the findings of the earlier trial, conducted in
Leningrad: 100% success rate. This time the results were officially
recognised.
Whilst
the Russian trials tended to focus on treatment of Asthma, it should be
understood that this method is also extremely effective for a whole
range of related disorders such as allergies, rhinitis, bronchitis,
sleeping disorders (such as sleep apnoea), breathing problems, etc.
|
|
|